Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- simple_sequential_baseline_test [2019/06/28 19:05] – admin
+++ simple_sequential_baseline_test [2019/06/28 19:05] – admin
@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 sys 0m0.217s</code>
-===Direct Read Test===
+**Direct Read Test**
 You can reverse things to see what the read test looks like, things should be faster on reads in all cases with respect to the SSD:
@@ Line 25: / Line 26: @@
 user 0m0.015s</code>
-===Read Cache Test===
+**Read Cache Test**
 (testing the DRAM memory, and system in this case)
@@ Line 38: / Line 39: @@
 sys 0m0.296s</code>
-===IBM P520, POWER6, PowerVM (with RHEL6), Hitachi Ultrastar 15K300 SAS, 147GB===
+====IBM P520, POWER6, PowerVM (with RHEL6), Hitachi Ultrastar 15K300 SAS, 147GB====
 <code>Direct write: 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 14.604 s, 73.5 MB/s
 Direct read:  1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 16.7439 s, 64.1 MB/s
@@ Line 45: / Line 46: @@
 </code>
-===USB UAS attached Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD, attached to Intel NUC NUC6i7KYK===
+====USB UAS attached Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD, attached to Intel NUC NUC6i7KYK====
 Benchmarking an encrypted filesystem, the speed drops to around 370MB/sec write, 430MB/sec read.
 <code>Direct write: 2147483648 bytes (2,1 GB, 2,0 GiB) copied, 5,11402 s, 420 MB/s
@@ Line 52: / Line 53: @@
 </code>
-===USB UAS attached Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD, attached to Lenovo X1 carbon (2015), LUKS encrypted fs===
+====USB UAS attached Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD, attached to Lenovo X1 carbon (2015), LUKS encrypted fs====
 <code>Direct write: 1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 3,23224 s, 332 MB/s
 Direct read:  1073741824 bytes (1,1 GB, 1,0 GiB) copied, 3,14576 s, 341 MB/s